Allah excluded the Imams from having authority out of grace?

Share

The Imamah as you all know is one of the weakest theories regurgitated by the sick minds of some confused people in the past, and every now and then a new “crack” appears in the fake outer-shell of this theory, and as usual the Shia scholars will try their best to fix the image of their Madhab by making an excuse for the need of Imamah and so on…

So they will tell you that Imamah is a grace from Allah and a kindness on his part towards his slaves, but did you guys also know that the fact that the Imams NEVER ruled and NEVER received positions of authority is also a kindness and grace from Allah!?
Because Allah knew that people will commit evil acts, and that corruption will happen, so he did not wish for this corruption to happen during the rule of the Imams, he wanted it to happen during the rule of their enemies:

محمد بن الحسن الطوسي في كتابه ( الأمالي ) ص 226 : 395 / 45 – أخبرنا محمد بن محمد ، قال : أخبرنا جعفر بن محمد بن قولويه ( رحمه الله ) قال : حدثنا أبو الحسن علي بن حاتم ، عن الحسن بن عبد الله ، عن الحسن بن موسى ، عن عبد الرحمن بن أبي نجران ، ومحمد بن عمر بن يزيد ، جميعا ، عن حماد بن عيسى ، عن ربعي ، عن الفضيل بن يسار ، قال : قلت لأبي عبد الله ( عليه السلام ) : لمن كان الأمر حين قبض رسول الله ؟ قال : لنا أهل البيت . فقلت : فكيف صار في تيم وعدي ؟ قال : إنك سالت فافهم الجواب ، إن الله ( تعالى ) لما كتب أن يفسد في الأرض ، وتنكح الفروج الحرام ، ويحكم بغير ما أنزل الله ، خلا بين أعدائنا وبين مرادهم من الدنيا حتى دفعونا عن حقنا ، وجرى الظلم على أيديهم دوننا

Shia leader, al-Sheikh al-Tusi narrates in his “Amali” pg.226:
[Muhammad bin Muhammad told us, Ja`far bin Muhammad bin Qawlaweih told us, abu al-Hasan `Ali bin Hatim told us, from al-Hasan bin `Abdullah, from al-Hasan bin Musa, from `Abdul-Rahman bin abi Najran, and Muhammad bin `Umar bin Yazid, all, from Rub`i, from Fudayl bin Yasar, that he said: I said to abu `Abdillah (as): “This position was given to who after the messenger (SAWS) passed away?” he replied: “To us, Ahl-ul-Bayt.” I said:”Then how is it that it fell in the hands of (the tribes of) Taym and `Adi?” he said: “You have asked so now you need to understand the answer. Allah most high when he wished for corruption to happen in this earth, and that the forbidden adultery would take place, and that there would be those who do not rule according to the law of Allah, He then allowed our enemies to achieve their goal in life and push us away from our rightful place, so that all of this oppression would be happening under their authority not ours.”]

ابن بابويه القمي في كتابه ( علل الشرائع ) ( 1 / 153 – 154 ) باب رقم ( 122 ) ( العلة التي من أجلها ترك أمير المؤمنين مجاهدة أهل الخلاف ) :[ 14 – حدثنا محمد بن الحسن قال : حدثنا محمد بن الحسن الصفار ، عن يعقوب بن يزيد ، عن حماد بن عيسى عن ربعي عن فضيل بن يسار قال : قلت لأبي جعفر أو لأبي عبد الله عليهما السلام حين قبض رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله لمن كان الأمر بعده ؟ فقال لنا أهل البيت قلت : فكيف صار في غيركم ؟ قال إنك قد سألت فافهم الجواب إن الله تبارك وتعالى لما علم أنه يفسد في الأرض وتنكح الفروج الحرام ويحكم بغير ما أنزل الله تبارك وتعالى أراد أن يلي ذلك غيرنا ].

Shia leader, ibn Babaweih al-Qummi narrates in “`Ilal-al-Shara’i`” 1/153-154:
[Muhammad bin al-Hasan told us, Muhammad bin al-Hasan al-Saffar told us, from Ya`qoub bin Yazid, from Hamad bin `Isa, from Rub`i, from Fudayl bin Yasar, that he said: “I said to abu Ja`far or abi `Abdillah (as) when the messenger (SAWS) passed away, who was supposed to be given authority after?” he said: “To us Ahl-ul-Bayt.” I said: “So how did it end up with the others?” he replied: “You have asked now understand the answer. Allah most high knew that there would be corruption in this earth, and that forbidden adultery will be done, and that there shall be ones who rule with other than the rule of Allah, so He most high wanted others to be responsible for it.”]

محمد آصف المحسني في كتابه ( مشرعة بحار الأنوار ) ( 2 / 33 ) حيث قال ما نصه:[ ولعل سائلاً يسأل لم أعجز الله علياً عن أخذ الخلافة ولم يوفقه لها كما وفق النبي صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم لإبلاغ الرسالة. ويمكن أن يجاب عنه بما في رواية الفضيل ( 29: 441 برقم 34 ) وصحيحته ( برقم 35 ) بتوجيه علمي معقول تركناه مخافة إطالة الكلام ].

And this was authenticated by their top contemporary scholar Muhammad Asif Muhsini in “Mashra`at Bihar al-Anwar” 2/33:
[And maybe someone will pose the question “Why did Allah not allow `Ali to receive the Khilafah like he allowed the Prophet (SAWS) to deliver the message?” It is possible to reply to this with the narration of al-Fudayl (29/441 Hadith #34) and his SAHIH (Hadith #35) in a scientific way that we shall not mention now out of fear of prolonging the book.]

Truly, the Shia faith makes no sense.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*